附录：《共和国辞典016期》资料 之二 of two Major surgery on Chinese characters: stroke reduced by nearly half

• 【试用】“二简字”引发反弹：半年后即停止试用

附录：《共和国辞典016期》资料 之二
	对汉字进行大手术：笔画减少将近一半
	“二简”与“一简”一样，都是针对最常用的字，比“一简”还要简单。几乎动用了所有的方法，想方设法减少笔画、简化结构。大致上可以从简化形体和同音兼并两个方面去分析，这两者不是截然分清的，有部分是交叉内容。虽然“二简”只对常用字简化，但汉字的体制并不允许随便地对局部进行改造，其原有的成分与新简化字相互抵触。所以，“二简”突破了“以利目前使用”、针对常用字的原则，力图全面的改进汉字的总体功能。因此，淘汰了一部分“容易读错和写错的字”，改为同音字；将一些复杂的偏旁和结构简化或变换为新的写法；合并了一部分偏旁。这种简化实际上是对汉字进行了大的手术。具体可参加下图：

简化结果为：“草案”把原来590个一简字化为462个二简字(不包括简化偏旁类推出来的391个二简字)。平均笔画从13．1降低到6．9，二简字比原来的一简字的笔画几乎减少了一半。在看似取得重大成就的同时，也引发了巨大的反弹。 [Trial] "two simple words" triggered a rebound: six months after the trial to stop Appendix: "Dictionary of the Republic of 016" information of two Major surgery on Chinese characters: stroke reduced by nearly half "2 Jane" and "a simple", are for the most commonly used words, than "a simple" but also simple. Almost all the methods used to find ways to reduce strokes, simplify the structure. Can be simplified from the simplified form and homophonic merger of two aspects to analyze, the two are not clearly distinguish, some are cross content. Although the "two simple" simplified characters only, but the system of Chinese characters does not allow any part of the transformation, the original composition and the new simplified characters contradict each other. Therefore, the "two Jane" breakthrough "to facilitate the current use", for the principle of commonly used words, trying to comprehensively improve the overall function of Chinese characters. Therefore, the elimination of part of the "easy to read and write the wrong word" to homophone; some of the complex simplification and transformation of the radical and the new wording; This simplification is in fact a large operation on Chinese characters. Specific can participate in the following figure: The simplified result is that the "draft" reduces the original 590 to 462 simple words (excluding the simplified 391 biases of the radical class). The average stroke was reduced from 13.1 to 6.9, and the simplified Chinese characters were nearly half the original stroke. In the seemingly made significant achievements, but also led to a huge rebound.

批评者称：“二简字”缺胳膊少腿，难看至极

1978年3月4日，胡愈之、王力、周有光等23人联名写信给第五届全国政协秘书处和第五届全国人大第一次会议秘书处，要求第五届全国政协和第五届全国人大的主要文件不采用草案第一表的简化字。 胡愈之、王力、周有光等本是文革前文字改革委员会的重要人物，叶籁士最初领导文字改革委员会搞“二简字”时，他们还深陷文革漩涡中不能自拔。随着文革的结束，他们逐渐得到平反。这些制定“一简字”的老一辈专家，认为二简字有很大不妥之处，一些字根本就是生造。 批评者说，直观地看，这些简化字缺胳膊少腿难看至极。专家指出，“二简”方案放弃了原来取得成功的以“简化偏旁”和“可作简化偏旁的简化字”为简化的主要方式，而是缺乏规律地甚至是大量地简化字形；一些字只在个别行业或某个地区使用，普遍性不强。有的为简而简，是人为新造的，缺乏约定俗成基础，所以难以推行。而且方案拟订和公布过程十分仓促，事先既未召开文字改革委员会全体会议讨论，也未经广泛听取群众意见。不像“一简”方案那样慎重地事先广泛征求意见，专家反复讨论、征求意见并修订。 1978年4月到7月，国家教育部、中共中央中宣部分别发出内部通知，在中小学课本、教科书和报纸、刊物、图书等方面停止使用第一表简化字。 Critics say: "two simple words" lack of arms and legs, ugly extremely March 4, 1978, Hu Yuzhi, Wang Li, Zhou Youguang and other 23 people jointly wrote to the fifth session of the CPPCC National Committee and the fifth session of the National People's Congress of the first meeting of the Secretariat, asked the Fifth CPPCC National Committee and the first The main document of the Fifth NPC does not use the simplified form of the first table of the draft. Hu Yizhi, Wang Li, Zhou Youguang, etc. This is the text before the Cultural Revolution, an important figure in the reform committee, Ye Yishi Shi first led the words Reform Commission, "two simple words", they are deep in the swirl of the Cultural Revolution can not extricate themselves. With the end of the Cultural Revolution, they gradually get vindicated. These developed "a simple word" of the older generation of experts, that the two simple words have great wrong, some of the words is simply made. Critics say, intuitively, these simplified characters lack arms and legs extremely ugly. Experts pointed out that the "two Jane" program to abandon the original success of the "simplified radical" and "can simplify the radical simplified word" as the main way to simplify, but the lack of regular or even a large number of simplified glyphs; In a particular industry or a region, the universality is not strong. Some are simple and simple, is a man-made new, lack of common ground, it is difficult to implement. And the process of preparation and publication was very hasty, neither prior to the convening of the Committee on the Reform of the Word, nor had it been widely heard by the public. Unlike the "one Jane" program as carefully in advance to solicit opinions, experts repeatedly discuss, seek comments and amendments. April 1978 to July, the Ministry of Education, the Central Propaganda Department of the CPC Central Committee issued an internal notice, in primary and secondary school textbooks, textbooks and newspapers, publications, books, etc. to stop using the first table simplified characters.